Originally Posted by
LeeMat
The part I quote above was just one of many examples of the far reaching weak arguments being used. Its actually funny to read.
You mean where the UAL attorney is cross examining and he asks the CAL guy about UAL's orders for 25 firm 787 orders and 50 options, plus the 25 firm A-350 orders and the 50 options and the CAL guy basically can't define "firm" because he doesn't know what that means!?
Or when they mentioned the first delivery of the A-350 the CAL attorney said that wasn't going to happen for 5 years and may not happen...then the UAL attorney said that 2015 was only 2 years away.