View Single Post
Old 04-18-2013, 06:56 AM
  #176  
TonyC
Organizational Learning 
 
TonyC's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Directly behind the combiner
Posts: 4,948
Default

RE: Excess bids

Originally Posted by FDXLAG View Post

The legislation and regulation change is what caused/allowed them.

The CBA allowed them.

Management caused them.

The age change should have caused our seat progression to stall for a maximum of 5 years. System growth, deaths, loss of medical, failure to pass checkrides, the desire to retire prior to 65, and numerous other circumstances should have made the stall something less than 5 years.

Jack's decision to spring the over 60 crowd from the back seats with an Excess Posting instead of a Vacancy Posting is what sent our seat progression backwards. Until then, nobody had ever been forced to give up a seat that he was awarded on a previous bid. Jack changed the dynamic by pushing people backwards, and created the animosity that still plagues us now.

I just wish we could all focus that animosity in the correct direction.






.
TonyC is offline