Originally Posted by Sunvox

I am sorry if my approach to analyzing previous awards is upsetting to you, and yes not only did I read each award cover to cover, but I went onto other forums and asked questions about the awards from the people involved and I read the dissenting opinion in the Nicoleau award. The UAL MEC posted this information before there was even a merger actually announced and the ALPA library had even more documents online. I also have another thread in which I posted some specifics of the Pinnacle lists makeup. Did you know that list put furloughed pilots in with active pilots. Shocking! Impossible!

So, like I said I could be wrong, but there is a long history of category and class integration even when companies have vastly different "career expectations". So if I have to chose between expecting a list similar to what history shows is likely and a list with a whole new underlying paradigm that will favor the company with perceived better financials and career expectations, then yes I admit I claim "unassaiable superiority".

Again sorry if the historical facts upset you.

Joe Peck


Here is the Pinnacle list taken from the actual document, and I would note that within each silo the pilots were sorted based on DOH even though this was a "windfall" for some pilots especially since they had zero career expectations with the planned removal of the 50 seat fleet from the Delta code share agreement:







Pinnacle ISL Decision