Originally Posted by
CALFO
I still don't see it in the award. Were those furloughs recalled between merger announcement and isl?
It didn't matter. Their longevity was given to them at 100% within their bucket that they had been placed...
The arbitrators didn't look at active or not. They just looked at their longevity. It's likely they will do something similar here.
Longevity was added as a mandatory element to prevent a CAL ALPA style recommended seniority list.