Originally Posted by
Really
Not sure why so many people are hung up with a 99 hire matching up with a 05-07 hire. (on SLI list) This happens all the time in our industry! If the merger never happened and UAL started to hire again, guess what, 99 hires would have been next to 13 hires!!!(on there OWN list!) I know guys will get on here and say UAL was getting ready for merger! Until they can publish some documentation on that it's all just hearsay!! Is it more of a 99 UAL next to a 07 CAL the REAL problem? Just saying!
Plus '99 hires would NOT be next to '13 hires. There are 2000 hires, 2001 hires, 2007 hires, and 2008 hires.
An '07 hire had 3 years of longevity on the merger date, a '99 hire close to 11. Almost 4 times as much longevity.