Originally Posted by
rickair7777
Sorry, not going to let this one go...
Either you or your broker are blowing smoke.
An "inert" SM2 missile would still be a 3,000lb near-hypersonic object loaded with rocket fuel. Guess what? That's still all kinds of dangerous, so they don't "routinely" shoot "warheadless" missiles anywhere outside of designated ranges. Honestly I don't think there is a such a thing as "warheadless" SM1 or SM2. There are inert practice rounds which are TOTALLY inert (no warhead or motor) and are used for ships to practice handling and arming (the dummies have electronics to simulate the arm/launch sequence).
Ranges are all either restricted areas (US waters) or warning areas (International waters) and the range controller will never clear the shooter hot until the range is verified free of interlopers. If any such areas were is use, there would have been a NOTAM issued. If for some reason the navy wanted to do a "super-duper extra-secret" missile test and not tell anyone, they would conduct it in the open ocean in the western pacific, not within spitting distance of NYC and busy air corridors without warning anyone.
Nailed it!
A little additional: The planning and paperwork required to be filed ahead of time for use of a warning area or range is lengthy and required, period!
I cannot fathom how folks can even think military actions are conducted otherwise. For folks that do not realize it; weapons and flight maneuvers as examples; are not conducted on a whim wherever you decide it feels good.
Why I even took time to put this in print..not sure. Get a grip theory mongers!