TWA Flight 800 Findings
11-16-2015 | 06:22 AM
#191
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,148
Likes: 43
From: Volleyball Player
Can you even hear yourself type?
11-16-2015 | 06:38 AM
#192
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Easy enough to check isn't it?
11-16-2015 | 06:51 AM
#193
With The Resistance
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,191
Likes: 0
From: Burning the Agitprop of the Apparat
11-16-2015 | 07:06 AM
#194
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
The first order of business would be to have an investigation by the NTSB and and whoever THEY want to admit as parties, and collect the facts and verify and confirm the information they have to date. And go from there.
11-16-2015 | 07:19 AM
#195
With The Resistance
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,191
Likes: 0
From: Burning the Agitprop of the Apparat
"The four-year NTSB investigation concluded with the approval of the Aircraft Accident Report on August 23, 2000, ending the most extensive, complex, and costly air disaster investigation in U.S. History."
Sure, another four years would straighten it all out.
Thanks for sharing that with all of us here.
11-16-2015 | 07:50 AM
#196
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
A lot of people at the board think the case needs to be reopened but won't say anything publicly. I don't even bring it up with ones I keep in contact with because of the concern it may harm their careers. I knew the original IIC from when he did general aviation accidents. He was replaced after a few months into the TWA investigation and has since retired. Another acquaintance at the board's lab was demoted and sidelined for just being willing to discuss all possibilities. It should be noted that the managing director of the NTSB who is currently defending their report comes from a public relations background and has no aviation experience, or any other transportation experience, at all.
11-16-2015 | 08:14 AM
#197
With The Resistance
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,191
Likes: 0
From: Burning the Agitprop of the Apparat
A lot of people at the board think the case needs to be reopened but won't say anything publicly. I don't even bring it up with ones I keep in contact with because of the concern it may harm their careers. I knew the original IIC from when he did general aviation accidents. He was replaced after a few months into the TWA investigation and has since retired. Another acquaintance at the board's lab was demoted and sidelined for just being willing to discuss all possibilities. It should be noted that the managing director of the NTSB who is currently defending their report comes from a public relations background and has no aviation experience, or any other transportation experience, at all.
So you knew a guy that knew a guy?
11-16-2015 | 08:15 AM
#198
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
No, I know two people who tried to do their job absence influence.
11-16-2015 | 08:19 AM
#199
With The Resistance
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,191
Likes: 0
From: Burning the Agitprop of the Apparat
Well I guess they will take their secrets to the grave.
We will give all due consideration to your testimony here and wish you a good day.
We will give all due consideration to your testimony here and wish you a good day.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
