Originally Posted by
bliddel
I will confess that certain events have caused me to have a certain distrust of our federal government. While conspiracy theories are indeed often either amusing or entertaining, and sometimes intriguing, I don't think it appropriate to summarily label and dismiss every conspiracy theory just because it fits the label. I see myself as sometimes more of a scientist than an engineer. I tend to believe what the engineering manual says, but I remain open to the notion that new information could (at least theoretically) come to light. I don't see any new information coming to light here, in part because of the many who seem willing or eager to exclude new information unless it is "provable beyond reasonable doubt". On the other hand, neither is it the burden of the disbeliever to disprove every crackpot theory beyond reasonable doubt. If it were, my name might be Russel, and I might have a teapot in solar orbit.
Excellent.
Maybe you will also take a look at the items I suggested before and take a scientific/engineering approach to explaining the tactics, logistics and timing of such a feat; THEN add in the human factors explanation of keeping it all quite.
I think it was ridculous knwoing what I know when the theory was one missile. Now the *new light* of 3 MISSILES were involved according to the review of the show - I can't stop shaking my head at the absurdity of the notion. Here is a bright point in all of this - - maybe the show isn't really trying to push that angle and it is just all a big misunderstanding.