Originally Posted by
sleeves
So because we do not agree, and you lose the argument (pay banding) then unity is destroyed?? I see, as long as we do as you want then you are on board. That is not unity.
Sleeves,
The unity issue is framed by many instances, not just the idiotic pay banding compromise.
Don't forget about the training debacle when the CAL MEC decided to thumb their noses at us when our training and procedures underwent wholesale and idiotic changes nearly by fiat Opportunity lost, division created.
Don't forget about the chance to put the screws to the company during the profit sharing debacle. Opportunity lost, and division created.
Don't forget about the numerous times during JCBA negotiations JPOS agreed to agree with the UAL MEC and then instantly changed his tune the minute they were in front of the company negotiators or the times when our moves were telegraphed to the company ahead of time.
Don't forget about Ben's letter and now Oscars "press to test" on the other forum.
Don't forget about LUAL MIGS now flying for CAL getting tossed out of a union meeting.
I'm sure that there are more, these are just the ones that pop into my head. Perhaps some others will add to the list.
And your SLI proposal, which puts guys with 15-16 years of longevity behind your recent hires is simply idiotic and not worth comment. Basically to us its an extended middle finger and seniority grab.