Projection
08-26-2013, 03:31 PM
#41
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 75
You know, sometimes I simply cannot believe what I read on these forums.
If I was a CAL new hire who happened to be a UAL furloughee, and that bothered the local council, that would be their problem not mine. I cannot imagine any legal justification those CAL guys had to exclude a CAL pilot from a local council meeting. I suspect the reason the guys that were "asked to leave" are keeping quiet is because their attorneys told them so.
What a reckless overreach by a "union" council.
If I was a CAL new hire who happened to be a UAL furloughee, and that bothered the local council, that would be their problem not mine. I cannot imagine any legal justification those CAL guys had to exclude a CAL pilot from a local council meeting. I suspect the reason the guys that were "asked to leave" are keeping quiet is because their attorneys told them so.
What a reckless overreach by a "union" council.
08-26-2013, 04:03 PM
#42
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Posts: 108
Originally Posted by bbhnpd
You know, sometimes I simply cannot believe what I read on these forums.
If I was a CAL new hire who happened to be a UAL furloughee, and that bothered the local council, that would be their problem not mine. I cannot imagine any legal justification those CAL guys had to exclude a CAL pilot from a local council meeting. I suspect the reason the guys that were "asked to leave" are keeping quiet is because their attorneys told them so.
What a reckless overreach by a "union" council.
If I was a CAL new hire who happened to be a UAL furloughee, and that bothered the local council, that would be their problem not mine. I cannot imagine any legal justification those CAL guys had to exclude a CAL pilot from a local council meeting. I suspect the reason the guys that were "asked to leave" are keeping quiet is because their attorneys told them so.
What a reckless overreach by a "union" council.
If I remember correctly the L-UAL folks at L-Cal had their dues or assessment split. Part going to normal representation, part going to L-UAL ALPA for SLI representation. So wouldn't it follow that they should be excluded from participating in discussions involving the L-Cal side?
08-26-2013, 04:12 PM
#43
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Position: B767/757 Capt
Posts: 182
Originally Posted by Kilder
Ok, so now Unity = Give up
So now you want our Rep. bases, our 787's, our Captain seats our growth...what's next our homes, wife's and children???
So now you want our Rep. bases, our 787's, our Captain seats our growth...what's next our homes, wife's and children???
08-26-2013, 05:13 PM
#44
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,866
Originally Posted by APC225
Mitch, In your opinion, having heard what was discussed for these 15 minutes, do you think this was necessary?
Originally Posted by horrido27
My opinion.. after all was said and done, there was nothing super secret or "classified" that would have been an issue. But that was my opinion After The Fact
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
