Projection
08-26-2013 | 02:24 AM
#41
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
From: Captain
I also want to add that last year I attempted to attend a LUAL Local Council meeting. This was after the Profit Sharing Debacle. My Guard buddy was going and I was going to join him. A couple of days before the meeting he told me that he had spoken with his Rep (can't remember which one..) and was told that it was not a good idea for me to attend.
Ok.. no worries. Life went on.
Motch
Ok.. no worries. Life went on.
Motch
You speak of UNITY - why not do the right thing? Withdraw from the running for F/O rep and give your support for Rob S. That would speak volumes for your sincerity for UNITY.
08-26-2013 | 05:51 AM
#42
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Ok, so now Unity = Give up
So now you want our Rep. bases, our 787's, our Captain seats our growth...what's next our homes, wife's and children???
08-26-2013 | 05:56 AM
#43
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
From: Captain
08-26-2013 | 06:06 AM
#44
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
She's very cute, 5'7, 125lbs and long brunette hair and works out every day but that's not the point...I think Motch brings a lot of energy into the Rep position, I don't agree with everything he says, but he seems to favor no side over the other. I think he will be a good rep for all New York pilots.
08-26-2013 | 03:31 PM
#45
Line Holder
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
You know, sometimes I simply cannot believe what I read on these forums.
If I was a CAL new hire who happened to be a UAL furloughee, and that bothered the local council, that would be their problem not mine. I cannot imagine any legal justification those CAL guys had to exclude a CAL pilot from a local council meeting. I suspect the reason the guys that were "asked to leave" are keeping quiet is because their attorneys told them so.
What a reckless overreach by a "union" council.
If I was a CAL new hire who happened to be a UAL furloughee, and that bothered the local council, that would be their problem not mine. I cannot imagine any legal justification those CAL guys had to exclude a CAL pilot from a local council meeting. I suspect the reason the guys that were "asked to leave" are keeping quiet is because their attorneys told them so.
What a reckless overreach by a "union" council.
08-26-2013 | 04:03 PM
#46
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
You know, sometimes I simply cannot believe what I read on these forums.
If I was a CAL new hire who happened to be a UAL furloughee, and that bothered the local council, that would be their problem not mine. I cannot imagine any legal justification those CAL guys had to exclude a CAL pilot from a local council meeting. I suspect the reason the guys that were "asked to leave" are keeping quiet is because their attorneys told them so.
What a reckless overreach by a "union" council.
If I was a CAL new hire who happened to be a UAL furloughee, and that bothered the local council, that would be their problem not mine. I cannot imagine any legal justification those CAL guys had to exclude a CAL pilot from a local council meeting. I suspect the reason the guys that were "asked to leave" are keeping quiet is because their attorneys told them so.
What a reckless overreach by a "union" council.
If I remember correctly the L-UAL folks at L-Cal had their dues or assessment split. Part going to normal representation, part going to L-UAL ALPA for SLI representation. So wouldn't it follow that they should be excluded from participating in discussions involving the L-Cal side?
08-26-2013 | 04:12 PM
#47
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
From: B767/757 Capt
08-26-2013 | 05:13 PM
#48
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,866
Likes: 0
Mitch, In your opinion, having heard what was discussed for these 15 minutes, do you think this was necessary?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
