Originally Posted by CanoePilot
It doesn't matter what the doj did for previous mergers.
Actually, yes it does - precedent means a LOT in the legal world.
The court looks at what is done in the current merger. If the doj can show that consumers would be harmed by the merger vs. non-merger then they win.
Then the DOJ shouldn't have any issue turning over the requested documents during the discovery process, now should they?
/not a lawyer, but wife is a paralegal in the contract law field