Old 04-15-2007 | 06:13 PM
  #8  
buddies8
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,707
Likes: 0
Default

ryane946
The post were referencing flow backs and flowthroughs going to AA and that was all I was responding to. The 10 years I mentioned were the AE retirements that YOU posted, I never stated 10 years at AA, I said tree years again based on YOUR numbers. The bull **** is spouted by the ones that know nothing and want to show some knowledge. The facts I posted are based on past practices at AMR and the plain simple fact that APA and AA are in contract talks at present an item you failed to mention or know. You must know a lot about AA going to retire MD 80's and new aircraft orders based on a 1 for 1. The flow back numbers were in my calculations, the flowthroughs were not because no-one knows what is going to happen on May 1st 2008 ( the termination of letter 3).

My short post history is my business, I only answer when I want to. I chose to answer here because people were making statements that were inaccurate and a couple looking forward to step on others. You know like the shi+ you spout.

But, what the heck, if your position is only a CFII I can see why you would know more than I. The fact that you can cut and paste information does not mean you know what they mean in the whole scheme, but I will bow to the double I. Maybe you have been doing to many spin maneuvers.

P.S.
You forgot Midwest!
Reply