View Single Post
Old 11-06-2013 | 12:13 PM
  #8096  
tsquare's Avatar
tsquare
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by scambo1
DALPA talks about time value of money.

I don't know anyone who has actually laid the SWA compensation of the 80's 'til today - actual W-2 earnings - on a scale of years with SWA, including upgrade time, next to the equivalent at Delta. Until this is done using verifiable numbers, nobody can make a blanket statement that SWA pilots undercut anybody...or that they didn't. However, due to their initial rapid upgrades, my bet is that TVM was in favor of SWA.

Everybody can look up SWA's stated rates. That isn't now, and wasn't in the past, the whole story. Their work rules are different. They don't pay by the minute (which rewards safety) They pay by the "trip" (which rewards efficiency). They have liberal time +1/2 and doubletime rules which rapidly skyrocket their pay without requiring a minimum number of hours to get there.

Today's reality:
-We can't turn 1 week of vacation into 3.
-We build our own retirements.
-We have had initial employment promises broken.
-We outsource a ton of flying.

The difference between DALPA/ALPA and SWAPA is that SWAPA fights to KEEP the flying in-house and KEEP the contract benefits intact. SWAPA especially defends their section 1, they don't monetize it.

No one is saying everything our union does is bad. There has been a lot of good. Nobody disputes that new hires at SWA are going to be stagnant for years compared to previously.

+4833
Do you believe that going forward, SWAPA will be able to hold fast to their currently onerous scope clause? I do not because SWA has reached a point where they are starting to need to grow internationally. If they don't, their earnings will suffer, and they will not grow. Grow or die. They cannot codeshare, and the 737 is a crappy airplane to do international. What's their solution? Just curious what you think going forward that they can do.......
Reply