Originally Posted by
Starcheck102
If you can't deliver evidence, then you don't deserve to be taken seriously.
Translation: you can't be taken seriously if you don't support ALPA without question.
Originally Posted by
Starcheck102
If you want to see the openers, then run for election this Spring.
Try to keep up ace. We want to see the last openers, you know, the ones for C2012.
Originally Posted by
Starcheck102
Do you want negotiators who act like businessmen, or ones who engage in populistic stunts that squander trust at the table?
Sharing both sides' opening position with the membership is not a populist stunt. We did that routinely at NWA. I know it's a scary thought for you to have anyone question leadership, but it'll be OK. You'll see.
Originally Posted by
Starcheck102
You can get up on your hind legs all you want, but that won't change the simple fact that acting like a horse's ass in negotiations has a way of extending the time needed to get to a TA.
And you can go off on a hysterical and emotional tirade all you want, but rolling over for management in negotiations will only get you COLA pay raises funded by concessions.
Originally Posted by
Starcheck102
Scabs, hackers, failed strategies, disappearing countdown clocks, cherry picked tax forms, scare tactics over Brady v. ALPA. How is it that these con artists earn your trust so easily? Your paranoia should be directed at the unelected, self-appointed snake oil merchants at the DPA who have abused your faith.
Welcoming scabs back to ALPA, hacking opponents websites, hidden strategies, disappearing LEC resolutions, LM-2's showing millions in income to ALPA royalty, and committing the act of DFR that earned ALPA the negative jury verdict. How is it this gang of utter incompetents still earns your trust? Your anger and rage should be directed at ALPA who's gotten us into this quagmire of self-serving greed and legal jeopardy.
Carl