For clarification purposes...... has OUR Union decided that the majority of it's members do not know what is best for them individually or ALPA as an entity? In his empirical wisdom, has DW decided to singlehandedly make a decision that negatively impacts a large body of the membership he is SUPPOSED to represent; without giving them the opportunity to have their single or collective voices heard on the subject? The Age 60 legislation is a train he has decided we ALL should jump onto without the clear support of the membership. I still fail to see the rationale for spearheading the advocacy of affirming the retroactivity issue. WHO exactly does FDX ALPA represent on this issue? I don't believe any of us can honestly answer this question unless it is put to a vote for the entire membership body. Until then, any claims of greed, shortsightedness or selfishness don't hold water. This is a MAJOR issue to a lot of careers; let the membership have their voice.