Originally Posted by
pilot64golfer
I agree. Putting 2007 hires ahead of 1999 hires was just wrong. Let's hope we can re-hear the SLI and just use our seniority this time.
I think you mean "longevity".
On the UAL side, everyone seemed to get at least their longevity until somewhere in 1996-97. Then it went heavily to the CAL side.
Once again, UAL ALPA sold out the bottom of the list…
CAL made such ridiculous arguments that the arbitrators disregarded their opinions altogether….so at least we had THAT!
