View Single Post
Old 05-18-2014 | 12:52 AM
  #52  
SEDPA
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 308
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by pilot64golfer
I agree. Putting 2007 hires ahead of 1999 hires was just wrong. Let's hope we can re-hear the SLI and just use our seniority this time.
Agree! They should have been placed in ratio starting with the first active UAL pilot, had the arbitration looked anything like the past precedents and awards of the last 30 years, prior to the merger policy change ... what was so terribly "just wrong" was ALPA changing the merger policy so as to hugely advantaged one group over another in reference to past integrations ... it let the arbs rape the CAL side to appease the UAL side (again, the reference being all integrations of the past 30 years pre-merger policy change) ... so as to avoid another "US Airways" defection ... disgusting, as is those who hide behind the policy change claiming "fairness".
Reply