Originally Posted by
MD11Fr8Dog
Actually, they are acknowledging that the
change is inevitable and going to happen no matter what, and as such is pursuing protection for all of those people's rights that they are required, by the CBA, to look out for - anyone on the seniority list! Its been a long week, but I have come from where most on this board are, to my current position. I don't like it, but it's reality!
So how is it, that protecting the current over age 60 guy's rights, under the CBA, the "right thing to do"...But, abusing the under age 60 guy's rights not the wrong thing to do?
I agree, the age 60 thing is most probably a done deal. But, actively trying to influence the new reg to include retroactivity, is wrong. That is not protecting the over 60 guys seniority rights. That is attempting to give them new rights.