Originally Posted by
RedeyeAV8r
Veil of secrecy?
You misunderstand my meaning. Many sessions were closed door by necessity. Not much of a need for closed door sessions or mentality anymore. If it is a clearly contentious issue, it should be put out for advanced discussion. I would say going against the majority opinion is contentious as well as retroactivity. I understand rolling over on Age 60 because it's Washington's way, but did you hear about retroactivity Before DW's email? I would thing moral support would be welcomed.
Originally Posted by
RedeyeAV8r
When all this came out back then, did you take the time to write your Rep?
Did you write the ME Officers?
Have you attended any of your LEC meetings or the open invititation to attend any MEC meeting? The Agenda is always published in Advance.
I registered my voice/vote as part of the majority in the May 05 survey.
Originally Posted by
RedeyeAV8r
Look, I'll be the first to grant you that it is your god given right as a member to be upset, and it is certainly your God given right to vent your displeasure at them. Hopefully you have already called or emailed your Rep and Called or Emailed your MEC officers.
Yes, I'm have written, got the scripted reply with no additional justification included.
Originally Posted by
RedeyeAV8r
There is a Chat forum that is very under utilized. We don't have to hide behind annonomous screen names. We can have frank and honest discussions.
Can't argue with that one.
.