Originally Posted by eaglefly

Details don't matter to USAPA. The facts are that in the past, ALPA East agreed to binding arbitration and refused to come off their DOH mantra or equivalent. Nicolau ruled and produced a legal and binding arbitration result which ALPA East subverted. To now say that the present success of the underhanded tactics of pre-USAPA is the same as that legal binding list being invalid is absurd. In the present, USAPA is now saying the very same thing about the MOU that just like the agreement to binding arbitration, they agreed to and signed is also now not valid.

You can argue your baseless rubbish until the swallows fly back to Capistrano, but it doesn't get any more credible. The present success so far of USAPA's end-run tactics around agreements they reneg on is hopefully about to come to an end.