Quote:
And they think APA has their back?
Absolutely fictitious. USAPA inherited a seniority list that lacked a contract to trigger its implementation. USAPA has held the process hostage in a delay effort to obtain all growth and upgrades before the inevitable Nic occurred. AOL was founded to insure that the legal obligations of the East were met. From their creation until the AA/US merger announcement, USAPA and the East faithful were still touting the "unions are a democracy and the majority (not legal obligation) rule" line. Remarkable how quickly they've changed their tune.Originally Posted by PurpleTurtle
AOL prevented any movement on SLI by suing about a contingent contract. Their case lasted years and didn't have a legal premise aside from "implicit assumption." .... and now they think APA will wrap everything up in a jiffy? And they think APA has their back?
So no, I'm not suggesting that APA will "have my back". But considering USAPA's idea of having my backing seems to require me to bend over and them to try to fondle my prostate, I'll take APA.