Originally Posted by JonnyKnoxville

The bottom line is that Crapgame may think he knows more than anyone else or he may actually know more than the judge that ruled this case but Crapgame's opinion does not matter and the judge's opinion did. That distinction is pretty important.

I find it humorous that the same people who attack the guy who ALWAYS wins and ALWAYS gets his way when he is up against the company are the same people that also seem to support the group that has been unable to get anything accomplished.

It is pretty simple really:

If you like the way things are, vote for the incumbent.

If you like your current CBA, vote for the guy who signed it.

If you want to try a different approach, vote for the guy that ALWAYS wins and ALWAYS gets what he wants when he is up against the company.