Thread: Nic ...
View Single Post
Old 09-23-2014 | 11:09 AM
  #560  
cactiboss
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by eaglefly
That's fine. If you're less stressed thinking APA put Nic in there as a wet sloppy kiss to the West, I say go for it. You've got to find a happy place to be in. Interesting article by Reed in Forbes about the Nic dispute. It seems clear the outside perception is that that SLI was serious flawed. Leo puts out a statement that APA is supporting their inclusion, then back-peddles a bit terming it "assumed". When APA is asked for comment on the issue, they said "no comment". It's just an observation, but that doesn't sound that wet and sloppy to me.
Forbes? Lol, you better research who Ted reed is before quoting one of his hack pieces.
Reply