Originally Posted by
Carl Spackler
That is the essence of the divide amongst our pilot group. Those that believe in this strategy and those that do not. But your above statement is incomplete and is typical of the pro Moak strategy folks. You agree with the strategy because it has put more in your pocket. Fine. But shouldn't the real statement be: " I believe that Moak's constructive engagement strategy has generally put more money and time off into our pockets since 2005 compared to any other strategy."
Carl
Okay, let's compare:
The left side of the table shows how our strategy stacked up against any other strategy out there. The right side shows what happened when everyone else started to adopt our strategy.
This is the essence of the problem. Do you want a strategy that produces results and money in your pocket or do you want a strategy that produces rhetoric and noise? I know Carl prefers rhetoric, noise, and deception, the majority of the Delta pilots prefer cash. Carl still can't handle the fact that he is in the minority, his ideas have been proven to be failures and his propaganda (as seen in over 10,000 posts) can't carry the day.