Originally Posted by
PurpleTurtle
I was strongly opposed to the MOU and voted against it because it had too many holes in it that DUI would abuse. This bar-napkin "offer" is 100 times worse.
This will cost us 2 cents for every penny increase.
And you were right. If I thought we had a chance of stopping it, I would have voted no too. But we didn't. The APA was going down this road with or without us. Absent our yes vote, we would have been just tagging along behind on LOA 93, until we had a JCBA, that would give us that they said anyway!
There was one thing that I thought we had in our favor-code share restrictions. That almost had me voting no, but I had no faith that we could pull it off.