Originally Posted by
eaglefly
Yes. It's termed a "comprehensive counter proposal", not an "LBFO" or anything with the term "final" in it. It's designed to allow compromise. A very few items might be rejected, but most will involve compromise. It's the most likely option and always has been. It's simply been a process of brinksmanship and clearly some don't have the stomach for that. Again, both sides want an out and to be able to claim victory in their own way, Parker to save face as being a tough Crandallesqe negotiator, yet achieving the perception of employee support and APA to be able to mitigate some of the fiasco of the LBFO disaster and yet be able to stand behind something that they can support and claim is truly the best that could be achieved and brings X value above arbitration.
I think they are close.......very close. Hopefully Parker doesn't blow it. If he balks and it goes to arbitration, they'll have to essentially start over again even if it's from a higher plane then the original "wants".
It is what I was saying this whole time I got here but NOPE! You kept saying "Arbitration, its better in arbitration". Don't give them ANYTHING. Drawing the proverbial "lie in the sand". Everyone here KNOWS your full of ----!
So I went with YOUR mantra LET'S GO TO ARBITRATION, DAMN THE BASTARDS!
And look, now you guys change your tune. You are exactly right:
Parker and Glass play you guys like a fiddle.
Hey you guys that LURK on these forums, do what you do best and fly airplanes. These web board negotiators have and always GIVE the company the TRUE track of the APA: disjointed, factionalized and most of all IGNORANT!