View Single Post
Old 01-07-2015 | 04:01 PM
  #54  
sqwkvfr
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 928
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by billyho
First off Jack you guys voted down a joke! It wasn't even CLOSE to an industry leading contract. Piedmont's 25 year old contract way more superior then that TA contract. Industry leading was thrown in there by Bedford.

The problem is Republic was formed and it launched the E-Jets. We had Piedmont people leave to fly the E-Jets knowing they'd make less money then flying a 37 seat prop. Knowing there insurance costs would more then triple.

I'm sure some had there reasons but they knew going into it what they were getting into. Those are the people that hurt the industry by going to crap hole airlines.

Now I understand your fight but I will tell you that Republic Pilots would've voted in our TA hands down. Better workrules, better insurance costs, flow thru. You would've been paid for you time. What you guys have now is a disgrace to all the other regionals that have fought hard for improvements. And the only reason was everyone was excited to fly a mainline jet.

I had one FO tell me he had to leave Piedmont for Republic because he was tired of telling people what kind of plane he was flying because it was embarrassing. I looked at him and told him, "what's more embarrassing the plane you are flying or what you're being paid to fly it?" Because there's no way in hell I'd fly a E-Jet for 20k a year and I'd be embarrassed telling anyone.
So by you own admission, you had absolutely NOTHING to do with your awesome 25(?)-year-old contract, yet you're claiming some moral high ground just because you decided to go to work for PDT and stay there?

Wow. WHAT a contribution to the industry. You should be one proud person.

I and a couple thousand other RJET pilots will fight every minute we're here to make the place better...not only for us, but those who follow AND every other pilot in the business.

We believe that a rising tide lifts ALL ships.....You'll pardon us if we don't exactly thank you for your contribution to that end.
Reply