"I'm a big fan of evidence and facts U haven't proven that a 90 CFI makes a worst/better student than a 20year CFI?"

Sorry, this sentence makes no sense. Since we're having an adult discussion here, you might want to try again, as words mean things. But I'll take a guess at your intent....

Are you saying a CFI with 90 days experience is going to be as good as a CFI with 20 years experience? And that I need to prove that to you, somehow, for you to believe it?

Sorry, some things in aviation can't be proven on paper. You just need to look to the opinion of the vast majority. I think I win on that one. But, knock yourself out if you wanna believe an ATP 90 day program CFI is as good as a guy who's been doing it for 20 years. I think it's a silly thing to even comprehend.

Makes more sense, though, if one believes hours/experience/background/seasoning mean nothing and that training can make up for it.

I don't believe that for a second....