Search
Notices
Flight Schools and Training Ratings, building hours, airmanship, CFI topics

I think I found a good thing...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-15-2007, 08:09 AM
  #91  
Gets Weekends Off
 
de727ups's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: UPS 757/767 Capt ONT
Posts: 4,357
Default

Is english your second language?
de727ups is offline  
Old 06-15-2007, 08:11 AM
  #92  
Gets Weekends Off
 
keiundraj's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: E145 Right Side
Posts: 209
Default

No my first one??? Am I writing an APA style paper Professor?
keiundraj is offline  
Old 06-15-2007, 08:30 AM
  #93  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SaltyDog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: Leftof longitudinal
Posts: 1,899
Default

Originally Posted by keiundraj View Post
Ok guys..... You all are saying that because that People just got their CFI license that they're in capable of instructing. I'm not disagreeing that an experienced CFI would be able to teach better. What I'm saying is that because he/she just got the CFI they're doing their student a dis justice.(Gotta start somewhere?) There's CFIs here at ATP that's been here 6months and have probably seen more Students and problems they're having that some CFIs with 2years of exprience. Due to the fact that there's new students starting Every Monday. I'm not trying to step on anyone's toes. I know I'm new on this side of the industry. I just don't get why people are so Hard on ATP here. I was at a Part 141 University before I came here. We'd set in the classroom for 3hrs 5days a week and probably flew 2hrs a week.... For me that type of learning didn't work. I learned here better sit in the classroom for 4hrs Fly for 2hrs. Do and discuss everything you just talked about in the classroom in the airplane! Not sure why there's such a vendetta against ATP their students, grads, and now their Instructors. Now by all means ATP isn't perfect, But it works, and i think that one needs to find out why it works instead of bashing EVERYTHING ABOUT IT!
I didn't bash ATP. Was discussing beyond ATP etc. and the limitations of any program. Have taught/teach/fly Military and Airline, started GA, brother is CFI/II/MEI with all the various backgrounds (ATP's,Comair Training. FBO etc) and who taught for a few years in the GA. We have had numerous discussions. Don't be overly defensive. ATP has strengths, market supports that. It has limitations too. So does my airline and service. Professionally we attempt to address our shortcomings.
SaltyDog is offline  
Old 06-15-2007, 08:34 AM
  #94  
Gets Weekends Off
 
keiundraj's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: E145 Right Side
Posts: 209
Default

Originally Posted by de727ups View Post
Is english your second language?
I think you're trying to derogate my character. I've given you my point of view on the situation, you have a right to disagree. I'm not at all disagreeing with what you all are saying. Sir It's obvious that you have a problem with ATP or any of the other fast track schools. That being said, I will not debase myself by reiterating the obvious! Some people are so into their ways and their beliefs that there's no way they can see things differently.
keiundraj is offline  
Old 06-15-2007, 08:40 AM
  #95  
Gets Weekends Off
 
keiundraj's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: E145 Right Side
Posts: 209
Default

Originally Posted by SaltyDog View Post
I didn't bash ATP. Was discussing beyond ATP etc. and the limitations of any program. Have taught/teach/fly Military and Airline, started GA, brother is CFI/II/MEI with all the various backgrounds (ATP's,Comair Training. FBO etc) and who taught for a few years in the GA. We have had numerous discussions. Don't be overly defensive. ATP has strengths, market supports that. It has limitations too. So does my airline and service. Professionally we attempt to address our shortcomings.
Sorry sir I was generalizing, I was referring to a couple people here that seems to dislike everything about schools like ATP's Comair and other type of schools. Some even seem to think that because someone has very little hours, they don't have the right to their opinion. I've said several times ATP has it problems. I'm agreeing that an experienced CFI is probably a better CFI. Sometimes he/she couldn't be though, I just think you have to see both sides of the picture??
keiundraj is offline  
Old 06-15-2007, 10:39 AM
  #96  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SaltyDog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: Leftof longitudinal
Posts: 1,899
Default

Originally Posted by keiundraj View Post
. I'm agreeing that an experienced CFI is probably a better CFI. Sometimes he/she couldn't be though, I just think you have to see both sides of the picture??
I do see both sides. eg, my example about the military use of newly winged aviators as IP's. All of your 'detractors' here also see both sides. Different ways to express it though. We haven't even touched on complacency
But that is the challenge for experienced or familiar folks. Even as you mentioned that some of your ATP CFI's wanted to blow off parts of a checklist (overly familiar thus complacent) which you declined (wisely) to do.
Maturity and professionalism is that antidote.
Antidote for inexperience is exposure in various operating environments. Read hours.
SaltyDog is offline  
Old 06-15-2007, 12:56 PM
  #97  
Gets Weekends Off
 
de727ups's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: UPS 757/767 Capt ONT
Posts: 4,357
Default

Keiundraj. I was seriously having a hard time following what you were trying to say because of your spelling, grammer, punctuation, ect.

It seems like my comment prompted you to clean up your act, which was it's intent.

Also, I've seen ESL folks who came across like you were because it was the best they could do. Hence, my question.
de727ups is offline  
Old 06-15-2007, 01:02 PM
  #98  
Gets Weekends Off
 
keiundraj's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: E145 Right Side
Posts: 209
Default

No problem sir.... Sometimes I get to thinking and typing so fast that I leave out a word/letter or two... I'm not allowed to edit my posts anymore? I've tried to clean them up after I mess up but I can't therefore you get what you see. I'm going to make a conscious attempt to read my posts before I hit the button from now on.
keiundraj is offline  
Old 06-17-2007, 01:16 PM
  #99  
Gets Weekends Off
 
stinsonjr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Posts: 919
Default

Twotters post was one of the greatest ones i have seen on APC, with the exception of the one that featured lots of bunnies with things stacked on their heads.

Here is my opinion, for what it is worth. I have a "good" job. Make a little more than a very senior captain at a legacy. The down-side is that it is not in aviation. For those seeking money, aviation is NOT the way to go. For those whop have always had a desire to fly professionally it is.

I have nothing against the pilot mills. What I wonder about is if the students get a real taste of aviation like i did hanging around the FBO. Lots of learning went on talking to other pilots, hopping fides in different airplanes, talking to mechanics and learning what makes the airplane work, etc. It seemed to me that some of my good lessons were learned this way. If ATP or others can give a pilot the texture and context that is necessary, then great. BU, don' knock the FBO route either.

Great post Twotter!
stinsonjr is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RockBottom
Major
23
02-06-2007 08:19 AM
sigep_nm
Regional
41
01-02-2007 09:35 PM
buffalopilot
Regional
37
11-29-2006 11:13 AM
CALPilotToo
Cargo
25
11-26-2006 10:15 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices