Originally Posted by
UofIflyer
It sounded to me that in their opinion if we were a wholly owned airline they would be able to make more progress but like tinman said there are very small profit margins to take from so they're going to work on "non-economic" improvements. Doesn't sound very promissing. Also, that for an airline to go on strike, which I'm not saying is a good or bad idea, is nearly impossible. So that's nice for management to never have to worry about that.
Does "non-economic" mean the same as "cost neutral"? I can't think of anything that won't in some way cost the company more money.