Originally Posted by
Professor
So. By your logic the councils need to be unanimous or we just punt? Right guys?
Because this is EXACLTY, precisely what you are saying. Correct me if I'm wrong. Your position is, if a council dissents on direction...all bets are off for negotiating?
Then what? Then what in the holy name of Omni Omni Vortac do we do then? What is the path forward from that?
You just got a glimpse into the sausage factory because council one couldn't stfup and do their job. This is all post game stuff that can be discussed after we win. This is talking to your pitcher during a no hitter.
BUSH LEAGUE council 1. Bush. League.
No, it doesn't have to be unanimous. I don't think that's the contention.
The problem, as I see it, is MEC insiders are trying to usurp the LEC and direct the negotiations. To top it off, it appears this new direction doesn't live up to the expectations or desires of our membership (survey). In addition to this, the administration is shutting the LECs out of the process with respect to information flow. Yes, if this is the case, it's a huge problem. I think C1 is just sounding the alarm. Kudos to them!