View Single Post
Old 06-16-2015 | 09:50 PM
  #13  
fanaticalflyer
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 317
Likes: 1
From: CAP A320
Default

Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets
Give me one good reason why they would need a SFO 756 or 76T base in SFO if CDG goes to the 787. They will be able to staff all the flying with EWR and LAX. Not saying its going to close but without JFK, SFO and/or LAX become redundant.

There is just not that much 757 flying going around to have EWR,DCA,ORD,IAH,LAX,SFO. Something is going to give.
You are a little out to lunch. They made the announcement of a new 756 SFO base less than two months ago. Are you saying management had no idea they were going to get rid of the PS flying to JFK at that time. What kind of hypothetical crap are you throwing out there. I don't need to answer that question "if the 787 takes CDG, will they need either a 76T or 756 base." The answer was given to you two months ago!!

Any more hypothetical stuff you want to throw out there? Are you the same person that argued with me two months when i told everyone that i had heard the 756 base was opening up in SFO before the end of the year? There were about three guys slamming me on that one, then the news came out a week later, and i could have heard crickets. Now i'm hearing this hypothetical garbage! Let's move on please.
Reply