Perhaps he didn't like it, perhaps he did, but that's immaterial because he wasn't citing it as the reason for his "yes" vote. The prior poster explicitly cited "scope" as the source of his "no" vote. The intent of the question was, in my estimation, to determine whether the original poster actually understood the scope provisions of the TA and had valid reservations about it or if he was misleading about his true reasons for voting or advocating "no".