Originally Posted by
BenderRodriguez
No, I haven't.


Let's get straight to it. I double dog dare you to sign your name to a letter like that.
But call it what you will, you do not talk to your employer like that. Standing by for the "But I don't work for Richard Anderson" quips
No. Clearly the letter is a vent and a rant. We are dealing with people here. There is emotion involved because we were set up for a big win. Instead, we got a rock.
I don't know what the outcome of the vote will be, but clearly I hope and pray it will be voted down.
There is miscalculation on the part of the company here and significant squandered goodwill. Anger is a natural response. The anger is somewhat misplaced IMO. It should fall squarely at the feet of the people who we pay 1.9% of our income to for representation.
As I've said before this should never have been TA'd. I have contacted everyone with whom I'm connected. Email, linkedin, phone, etc. there is nothing more I can do except vote no.
If it's voted down, we start with a clean slate and do section 6 the way it's supposed to be done. No quick back room Donatelli deals.
I am still in awe at how much we were lied to leading up to this.