Sailing,

Did the C2012 "no voters" misrepresent what was and wasn't in the TA after sending it out without recommendation?

I flew with a "yes voter" who switched to "no" the day before the vote closed, because of a Fed Ex Paper written by the DPA.

I'll repeat it again: A "YES VOTER" SEARCHING FOR, READING, AND BELIEVING DPA STUFF A DAY BEFORE THE VOTE CLOSED, CHANGED HIS VOTE, BECAUSE OF THE DPA.

How does that happen?

Because, by the end of the campaign, the side you seem to be protecting had NO credibility. ZERO. NONE.

There was nothing tin that TA that the membership wanted in a bad way.


What are they going to come out and say after their 7/21 meeting? "We will send out another survey to see what the membership wants?"

Yeah, right.

They won't suddenly regain credibility, because the vote is over. Once it's gone, it's gone.

They have got to go and you know it.

Why wait until the 21st? They should resign tomorrow.