Originally Posted by
gloopy
Why not?
Alaska flies to other DL hubs.
Look, I could care less about "calling it a hub" just to call it one. And I'm not against all code sharing with Alaska (although we need Horizon more than we need them at this point). I just want to protect our progress made there so far, particularly the narrowbody progress from a future Alaska code share abuse. We can still code share with them. I just expect language prohibiting us from pulling down what we're currently doing and transferring it to them.
That's 100% reasonable and fair, and is a zero cost item for them.
Section 1.O.3 is the reason why.
Denny