Thread: POP questions
View Single Post
Old 09-01-2015 | 10:32 AM
  #6  
iarapilot's Avatar
iarapilot
"blue collar thug"!
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,614
Likes: 0
From: A proponent of...
Default

If I read this section correctly, this is a major give back and windfall for the Company.

I know guys, who because of the initial HKG and CDG bids, who were getting POP for 3-4 years. That is a ton of money and cost the Company dearly. I would guess many hundreds of thousand $$.

Now they can worry a lot less about seniority when putting out and awarding bids and it will cost them a minuscule fraction of what they currently have to pay.

This, along with the possible major increase in insurance premiums due to a formula for calculating our costs that are way to fluid, and probable efficiencies they gain with other parts of the contract that are not cut and dry, I would guess that this isnt a TA that is cost neutral for them but one where there is a net positive.

It has been said over and over, but for a company that has been profitable forever, this is a total insult to the crew force. When are "we" going to say enough is enough!!!
Reply