Originally Posted by
RockyMtMadDog
Ah, so they just needed to hold the 8% until Jan 1 rather than start it on July 1. Then it would have been (14-6)/3/3 or 8/3/3, right? You want to pocket the six months early with your / / as though we missed a year. That's not honest.
Blind guides. You strain out a nat, but swallow a camel.
You were the initial one to suggest we call it a 8/3/3/ raise, instead of taking credit for profit sharing.
My / / (gnat) is exactly where our unions PTP guy told me the profit-sharing was coming out of -- begrudgingly.
My point (camel) is that we were initially told it was a 8/6/3/3 raise and it wasn't.