Originally Posted by
TonyC
Of course, we all know that ambiguous language always accrues to the benefit of the pilot, right?
.
Originally Posted by
PolicyWonk
Tony
This is almost the only instance I can think of where ambiguity is interpreted generously.
I can only think of one more, but I'm reluctant to draw attention to it for fear that if I do, it will go the way of all flesh.
What about this one:
Remember pre-Fox? A deviator got the higher of the original accepted fare or the actual, purchased, scheduled fare.
That was taken that away from us, without any changes to CBA language or even a grievance, after the fact. They just did it. Why? Because they could. Because it was not expressly written in the CBA.