Originally Posted by
pipe
ROCK, FDXLAG-
Both of you consistently challenge all of us for explanations regarding the plan after a no vote.
Will someone please throw me one sliver of explanation as to why ANYBODY thinks that the company would entertain retirement negotiations outside of Section 6? If the company was willing to fix retirement outside of contract negotiations, why didn't we address it years ago?
Pipe
Complete guess on my part, but I know the company wants to renegotiate our retirement. It sounds like that was one of our lines in the sand. If we approach them outside of section 6 with a list of options we would now consider, they might be willing to listen.
But I would not argue that someone should vote yes based on the hope of post TA retirement negotiations. I am voting on the TA for what is and isn't in it currently.