View Single Post
Old 10-07-2015 | 01:34 PM
  #16  
gettinbumped
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,282
Likes: 0
From: A320 Cap
Default

Originally Posted by Thor
Yes it's obvious that the company probably doesn't want to be constrained by the contract they signed and will most likely try to weasel out of the NSNB clause anyway they can.

My contention is that any relief is WAY more valuable than a mid-course pay adjustment. It's not called scope-CHOKE for nuthin'.

One solution is for the company to buy more narrow body airplanes which clearly would help the capacity problem and offer job security to those pilots near the bottom of the list. There's no reason for pilots to give away scope, or even relax it, for the company to take the "buy more lift" path. There truly isn't anything preventing them from bringing more mainline aircraft into the system.
I'm quite curious to see what the offer is, but I agree that any section 1 give would be an absolute non-starter. I'm very confident that our MEC feels the same way. They can ask all they want (as they did with the used A319 buy), but the answer is and will always be NOOOO
Reply