View Single Post
Old 10-13-2015 | 10:35 AM
  #90  
82spukram
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 406
Likes: 5
From: A320 FO
Default

Special:

I don't think anyone really expects much......they might hope but not expecting. I think the direction the NC was giving (not allowed to discuss section 1) is going to make this much ado about nothing. However the new boss might actually be trying (once again hope but not really expecting). This dialogue will more than likely show a lot of the company's cards coming up. The company has well as ALPA know what it takes to get 50+1%. Hence the statement NSNB order will be made upon ratification. 787 while keeping the 763 is the problem they have with lift(I'm pretty sure you already know that). They want to go further. I think that is a dangerous talk to have with Management. I am Jr and will not be bidding b77/78/74 ecause of small kids and a growing family And a desire to be home so any change will not effect me directly but as it was once explained to me on the Jumpseat when I worked for XJT crap flows downhill so I always look up to see what's going on. I will not vote for changes in the FRMS if it is not specific.and easy to understand Also 763 and 787-8 need the same pay now that the 763 is staying.

Any rate I personally don't think anything will pass ratification unless it's cut and dry and favorable terms. And I am thankful that some in the LECs and MEC pushed hard to add no change to section 1. That sends a powerful message to Willis Tower going forward.
Reply