Originally Posted by
gettinbumped
Not at all. How could I be pushing for a deal when there is no deal to push for? What I'm pushing for is an open negotiation and dialogue without the restrictions some folks on here want. My personal opinion is THAT is the way to achieve the most gains.... by getting creative and giving the negotiating committee the tools they need to come up with the best possible deal. There are three levels of protection from getting anything shoved down your throat so relax. The beauty is that we don't NEED any deal. So we have the benefit of having some leverage and exploiting that leverage.
I think if you read my posts you'll realize that what you said at the bottom of your post is just dumb. In no way shape or form am I for taking "concessions". You contend that realizing that adjusting some things in the contract could be beneficial to both parties is management shilling?? Sorry you feel that way. Seems narrow minded to me
Not narrow minded at all. If you want to contribute or express your opion to the MEC then let them know by all means but why come on an open forum and build a consensus to do it your way with regard to any possible details. Some on here want to jump to assumptions without giving the MEC a chance to filter the BS to get to what the company really wants.
You do know Munoz can't be up to speed on this and it's likely being pushed by remaining JS's minions to increase their creditability with with the new boss.