Originally Posted by
AllenAllert
You mean this little paragraph:
"In order to mutually seize the opportunities before us today for the benefit of both the Company and the United pilots, we would like to suggest we enter into an early and expedited period of negotiations with the Association for an extension of the current UPA. We generally envision negotiations along the following parameters, subject to final discussions and commitments between the parties:"
If you think this is anymore than an attempt from McKeen to earn his bones with the new boss you are wrong. Isn't he the same guy working to get the first merged contracts from other employee groups. Is it possible he's using the pilots to save his job. I suggest for our airline, our future and that of the other employee groups we say NO and see the true direction Monuz wants to take the company and the employees.
No, actually I was referring to this:
Jay, this time of senior leadership change is a unique opportunity for us. We hope you and the leadership of the Association agree. We look forward to discussing the opportunity presented to usher in a new era and relationship between the Company and our pilots.
So I just want to be clear.... you came on here and chastised me for pushing for a YES vote (which I've explained to you is incorrect. I would never push for a vote either way without seeing and understanding what's being voted on), and you follow that up with "I suggest for our airline, our future and that of the other employee groups we say NO"? You find it so egregious to push for a vote one way or another, yet you.... push for a vote.
Pot, meet kettle.