Quote:
A 1987-1990 hire below a 2013 AE flow is absolutely disgusting... More so my argument against his hail Mary hope of our CAs being placed below him... That's absolutely disgusting and Damn straight even ****es me off.... It's essentially trying to do another TWA staple and somehow I should find that acceptable? I'm sorry did I miss something that makes that acceptable?
Feel free to dig up whatever quotes. Last check things change... So the relevance of such seems questionable.... Hide behind a screen name too while you're at it... Glad you know who I am....
I have no idea who you are.Originally Posted by meyers9163
Missing the point....A 1987-1990 hire below a 2013 AE flow is absolutely disgusting... More so my argument against his hail Mary hope of our CAs being placed below him... That's absolutely disgusting and Damn straight even ****es me off.... It's essentially trying to do another TWA staple and somehow I should find that acceptable? I'm sorry did I miss something that makes that acceptable?
Feel free to dig up whatever quotes. Last check things change... So the relevance of such seems questionable.... Hide behind a screen name too while you're at it... Glad you know who I am....
Do you HONESTLY believe that anybody with even the slightest sense of integrity would actually expect a 1987-1990 hire to be below any flowthrough pilot? I know of NO ONE who actually believes something that crazy.
Thread drift, for sure, so I'll leave it there.
Back to the poolies...