View Single Post
Old 11-16-2015 | 06:03 AM
  #190  
jungle's Avatar
jungle
With The Resistance
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,191
Likes: 0
From: Burning the Agitprop of the Apparat
Default

Originally Posted by F4E Mx
I have been a party to several NTSB investigations where a eyewitness statement did not correspond to other eyewitness statements or to the evidence at the scene. In EVERY case the NTSB investigator thanked the witness for taking time to write his statement and to agree to being interviewed. In EVERY case all the eyewitness accounts were openly discussed and ALL eyewitness statements were included as attachments in the report. None were suppressed and no witnesses were derided. No CIA came out of the shadows with a video showing that the witnesses did not see what they saw.

The attention of many witnesses was drawn to the streak they saw rising from the surface; many had no idea there was even a plane in the area until a moment before impact when they noticed the navigation lights of the 747. There were over 200 witnesses with about 75 seeing the event from the surface up. And the time was seven minutes after official sunset which was hardly dark.

Perhaps you can discuss the letter the FBI sent to the FAA basically wanting the controller who initially reported a possible missile heading to the plane to recant? And the FAA reply telling the FBI to stick it?
Don't be so coy tell us who done it, surely you must have a theory about the who, what and why.
Don't hold back the good stuff about the shadow gov, false flags and the wider conspiracy, we are clearly waiting on your conclusions.
Nice windup, now throw your best pitch.