It seems that Tony is peeved that the company has to follow the law (which they have to do regardless of what our CBA says) and change the "normal" retirement age to 62, even though they are promising to make it cost neutral to anybody who retires in the normal fashion (starts their benefits right away).

Yet he worships the d-nozzles at ALPA and our own DW who gleefully brought us the change to age 65, and cost many of us thousands of dollars in potential earnings due to stagnation.

Puzzling.

Something to ponder while riding in a lie flat seat.