Originally Posted by
eaglefly
You mean like when I respond to your question with a specific and VALID answer, you characterize it as "fluff" ? AAG isn't trumpeting the 2.5/6 claim, Envoy management is, thus AAG or AMR isn't the issue with Envoy anyway, so asking me for examples of the color of my apples, when its oranges that apply is pointless. Even so, I proved my apples are red regarding AAG. I'd appreciate it if you stop mischaracterizing virtually everything I say.
The fluff was your opinion at the end.
The "them" I was referring to was Envoy management put in place after the AAG transition. I made that clear in the next post.
I didn't ask for fruit that only applied to you at mainline. I agree; that's pointless.
What did I mischaracterize?