View Single Post
Old 01-16-2016 | 05:17 AM
  #21  
scambo1's Avatar
scambo1
The Brown Dot +1
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,775
Likes: 0
From: 777B
Default

Originally Posted by Chuck Essential
*************************
The initial 8% hourly pay increase in the TA is significantly offset by the JV production balance, sick leave, and productivity concessions. Next year, the 6% is almost totally offset by the profit sharing conversion (assuming a PTIX of at least $6 billion), but we get about 1% more in vacation and training pay. Any raises granted to more than 30% of our fellow employees will be matched for us, up to 3% annually. In all, we realistically stand to not realize the initial net increase and probably not much more, if any.

Council 1 Captain Jon Lewis, Chairman First Officer Eric Hall, Vice Chairman
Council 20 Captain Bill Bartels, Chairman First Officer Rich Wheeler, Vice Chairman Captain Tom Bell, Secretary-Treasurer Council 54 Captain Jud Crane, Chairman First Officer Roger Goodwin, SecretaryTreasurer Council 66 Captain Tom Brielmann, Chairman First Officer Chris Hazleton, Vice Chairman Council 108 First Officer Ryan Schnitzler, Vice Chairman

**************************

After the TA failed, the Negotiating Committee Chairman challenged any of those named at the bottom of this statement to provide proof of the speculative financial impact analysis and not a single one of them could give an explanation based on facts. Several of them were asked during their own LEC meetings to provide the proof and, again, they could not.

The only defense they had was their admission that the statement was provided by a third party and none of them had come up with this analysis, but they believed it to be true, nonetheless, and published it.

It was a pure conjecture and it was published by this group in an effort to bolster the vote against the TA.
Hey Chuck,

How's Alpa nationals?

Your statement is misleading. The assertion made is forward looking and therefore unprovable. You are clinging to a TA that extended and added concessions.

Your defense of the indefensible is sad.
Reply